Edmonton Sun January 15, 2008
By NEIL WAUGH
Mr. Ed goes to Washington later today.
More to the point, finding someone at home in Power Town might be a tough chore, with the presidential primary season in full swing.
Even if Premier Stelmach tracks down some American pols willing to listen, it may be hard to tell if the message is "we're still open for business."
Or is it "Yankee stay home?"
I spent some time this morning with my friend Eric, the coffee roaster at Earth's General Store here in Edmonton. Our discussion included talk about mutual acquaintances who are interested in good food and drink.
It got me to thinking about an event that I want EnAct to put on: a local food festival. It would be during harvest time in the fall, and we could involve all kinds off people, from foodies to chefs to restaurants. All of the food would be sourced at least 95% from within 160km of Edmonton (100 miles).
Toxics Watch's membership has varied dramatically depending on its activity. As I mentioned in my introduction, we co-founded the Toxic Round-up and at that time had over 100 members. Our emphasis on membership declined as we focused resources on policy development and we currently are a volunteer board of 7 with a full-time staff of 2. We employ summer and contract staff on an opportunistic basis. While our group is currently small, our policy work is informed through our membership in the Alberta Environmental Network which is a provincial network of environmental organizations of 70 grou
In 1985, a young man named Brad Wylynko proposed a new project to the Environmental Resource Centre in response to the growing awareness that not all toxic chemical pollution is caused by industry.
The average North American household contains 25 kilograms/55 pounds of chemical products which, if released into the environment by a regulated company, would be considered hazardous waste. But households are not regulated and these substances are contained within familiar household products: paints, cosmetics, home, hobby and garden supplies, automotive supplies, batteries, and are all too often mixed with the household garbage. In another example of cumulative incrementalism, the relatively harmless actions of one person, multiplied by a thousands of people, creates unacceptable impacts to ground and surface water supplies.
This essay is shaping my thinking lately, as is this reaction.
http://blogs.onenw.org/onelist/001779.html
"Conservationist credibility with the public is falling, and for reasons greater than the most recent election we're losing traction with lawmakers. Many view the environmental movement as elitist and self-righteous, with "no" being the operative word in our vocabulary.
While our movement does much good, and conservation measures actually did well in the recent elections, we should be mindful of our failings, be they real or perceptions increasingly held by the public. Environmentalists are often viewed as detached from the lives of regular people, and in a public interest movement, this is very bad news.